Edward Andersson
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Me
  • Resources
    • Publications
    • Articles
    • Videos
    • Links
  • Contact
  • På Svenska

How to waste public funds and alienate voters

4/11/2011

0 Comments

 
Craig Newmark the Founder of Craigslist has a leadership principle that I subscribe to; he claims that often the most important thing an organisation can do is to ‘Get out of the way’. The Craigslist web design encapsulates this, ugly perhaps, but intensely functional. In web design it is easy for ambitious and well-meaning designers to create sites which overcomplicate things. This principle is one Government would sometimes do well to listen to. I’ve begun to ask myself, if Doctors have their Hippocratic Oath; a principle of doing no harm –should engagement practitioners not have the same?

Because, it’s not just more, but better engagement that we need. Quality counts in engagement. This isn’t a new argument, yet government agencies and authorities often continue to act as if numbers are what matter.

Bums on seats are not the measure of success. If this was the case then the Post Office Closure Consultations should have been a spectacular success, when in fact they probably did a lot of damage to people’s faith in government consultation across the board.

The stakes are high in the coming years; good engagement will be crucial, and bad engagement will be devastating. In my view badly designed engagement is a fantastic way to waste money and turn relationships with stakeholders and citizens sour as an added bonus.

So how do we spot when we are wasting time and money? My experience tells me that the following situations are tell-tale signs of bad engagement:

1.       When the answer doesn’t matter –the decision has already been made, the people you are asking can’t have an influence on the matter, or the decision is irrelevant to them.

2.       When you already know the answer–it is a technical question with a clear answer, participant comments will add nothing. However, before you stop engaging altogether remind yourself of Rumsfeld’s famous ‘unknown unknowns’. Often the greatest benefit of engagement can be the vital information the public has that you didn’t realise that you needed.

3.       When you don’t want to know the answer –engaging under the assumption that you’ll get a particular response or outcome (the one you’ve already decided you want) or, even worse, to convince participants of what you’re proposing is very dangerous and can backfire spectacularly.

4.       When the people you are asking don’t know the answer – it can be dangerous to ask people about issues they know little about. In the government spending challenge the suggestions from civil servants were stronger than from members of the public;  largely because the  former group was in a better position to answer knowledgeably. Citizens can (and should) discuss difficult issues, but they need support and information to do so.

5.       When people don’t care what the answer is –Some issues are not ones that people want to engage on. There are other ways of gathering data then engagement and consultation, for example monitoring and straight up research which might be a better use of your money and people’s time.

So in summary, ask questions that matter, of the right people and be honest about what you are willing to change and what is set in stone. Oh, and be prepared to get out of the way if need be.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Edward Andersson

    This blog is a repository for posts I have made over the years at Involve as well as more personal reflections.

    Archives

    October 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    August 2012
    April 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    November 2010
    October 2010
    July 2010
    May 2010
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    November 2007
    October 2007
    July 2007
    March 2007

    Categories

    All
    Blog
    Climate Change
    Consultation
    Costs And Benefits
    Crime
    Democracy
    Digital
    Duty To Involve
    E Democracy
    E-democracy
    Engagement
    Evaluation
    Facilitation
    Good Practice
    Health
    Innovation
    Involve
    Local Government
    Methods
    Nudge
    Online
    Participation
    Parties
    Politics
    Predictions
    Riots
    Safety
    Sustainable Development
    Turkey

    RSS Feed

Edward Andersson 2013-2018
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Me
  • Resources
    • Publications
    • Articles
    • Videos
    • Links
  • Contact
  • På Svenska